Posts Tagged ‘ marriage ’

About Those Milestones in Your Life…

railroad-track-switchI know, I know — it’s funny because my last post was about a freelancing “milestone.”

Totally unrelated to today. Pure coincidence, or else evidence that my train of thought shifts tracks slowly and reluctantly.

Thinking of the more general concept of “milestones,” though, as applied to life and adulthood — kind of creepy, no?

I don’t mean the specific events people are usually talking about. Birthdays, buying a house, having kids, getting a degree, a job; whatever — those are all things that can be evaluated on their individual merits, if you want to do that. I’ve questioned the intrinsic value of the big three (getting married, getting a house, and having kids) on the blog before, and you could probably apply similar evaluation to other major changes if you wanted to.

But regardless, isn’t it kind of weird to label them as “milestones,” like markers on some linear path?

Because let’s not kid ourselves; if life is a linear path, each marker gets you closer to a destination that I’m frankly ambivalent about.

Avoiding the major milestones doesn’t prolong your life, of course. You die just as soon single and childless as you do otherwise, and because people like to justify their life choices you can find plenty of studies arguing that you’ll actually live longer if you get married, or don’t get married, or have kids, or don’t have kids, or whatever. The timeline’s not going to change that much, is my point.

I just find the idea of celebrating major events as markers of progress, rather than as conclusive achievements of their own, awfully creepy, given the necessary implication of what you’re progressing toward.

Maybe if you slip a little memento mori in all your big celebrations. Embroidered skulls on the bridal veil; cheery “We Too Are Mortal” doormat at the new home. I can get behind that.

I mean, why not? I’m already behind on life, if you’re counting milestones.

Red Equal Signs Don’t Change Laws — But That Doesn’t Make Them Bad

All right, everyone. Simmer down.

I know we are all so smart and so jaded, and we can’t be fooled by, like, superficial gestures and shit, man, but making fun of the red equal sign meme isn’t pointing out that the emperor has no clothes — it’s criticizing the cut of his jacket.

For every action there is an equal and opposite whining on the intertubes, and just as my Facebook feed yesterday was cluttered with red equal signs, so today it is cluttered with complaints about the equal sign, some of them well-thought and carefully written and others not:

before-we-make-a-ruling

So yeah. Changing your Facebook profile photo, not gonna affect the Supreme Court decision that we won’t be getting until June anyway. And if you pointed that out to people who did change their profile, waiting proudly for their recognition of your brilliance and wit, you probably got the reaction you deserved (or maybe you have very patient friends).

I’m no great fan of what passes for “activism” on social media. I’ve thumped my head, privately and in writing, about the stupidity of it plenty of times.

But this time around it wasn’t really about changing minds on the bench of the Supreme Court. It was about making it painfully obvious to everyone that uses Facebook, through the sheer weight of obnoxious equal-sign graphics on their feed, that support for marriage equality is the norm now. The default position is “well yeah, duh.”

red-equal-sign-hrcAnd that’s something social media is actually surprisingly good at! Facebook is, if nothing else, an effective sample of the lowest common denominator’s tastes.

So yes, your friends who changed their profile picture weren’t having any effect on the Supreme Court. And yes, there’s all sorts of complicated baggage associated with the idea of marriage at all, and with the Human Rights Campaign that originated the equal-sign graphic, all of which people can and should work on unpacking in thoughtful and open ways.

But you know what? It’s still a good thing that the basis of the conversation has changed, and that enough people are willing to make some small gesture of support — even if it’s not well-thought support, or even if that’s all they’ll ever do — that it became obnoxious to people who are more deeply involved in the equality movement.

Support for marriage equality is mainstream now. That’s a good thing, and let’s all resist the temptation to tell people how we supported it before it was cool, or how we’re for this, like, kind of obscure equality that you probably haven’t heard of.

Herp Derp; Fox News Runs Same-Sex Kiss Above “Traditional Gender Roles” Op-Ed

You know it’s going to be a great op-ed when it starts with a Norman Vincent Peale quote, amirite? But before I get too gleeful, I should admit that Suzanne Venker’s atavistic Fox News piece on gender roles doesn’t explicitly say anything about same-sex relationships. The book she’s shilling is called “How to Choose a Husband and Make Peace with Marriage,” which maybe gives us a clue, but without actually reading it (I don’t love you all enough to do that sort of research), we can’t know what her opinion on same-sex marriage is.

So maybe it’s entirely okay that the FoxNews.com opinion page ran her op-ed, titled “To Be Happy, We Must Admit Women and Men Aren’t ‘Equal’,” alongside a photo of a same-sex marriage:

same-sex-kiss-empire-state-building

suzanne-venker-fox-news-screencap

But if I had to go out on a limb, I’d guess that Ms. Venker isn’t a fan of the kiss. I mean, one of those ladies is wearing trousers.

I honestly don’t know why the image is there. It’s the thumbnail for a video clip of an interview with Ms. Venker, in which the image never appears (and I watched all excruciating four and a half minutes of it to be sure; you’re welcome).

Herpa-derpa-derp, Fox News is good at itz jobz.

UPDATE: Fox has pulled the image/preview down, and at least for now the whole interview video it was showing up as the preview for as well. There’s now just an empty space for the third “related video” or whatever beneath the headline. Too bad like half the internet screenshotted it first, huh?

fox-news-edited-screenshot

Let Crappy Op-Eds Lie

I was going to do something for today’s blog with a Fox News opinion piece that various friends have been passing around (angrily) on social media, but upon reflection I’m not sure there’s much point.

You can click through and read it, if you want to; it’s some random guy telling us all how waiting to have sex until after marriage was great for him. Not exactly heavy stuff.

And yeah, the guy sounds like (and probably is) a total prick. The language is offensive, the attitude condescending, and the actual premise slightly absurd.

But what the hell do people expect?

It’s an opinion piece. They tend to be opinionated, and if you don’t share the opinion in question they tend to be irritating. When it’s on Fox, it tends to be extra-irritating, since the opinions usually exist independent of or often in contradiction to fact.

I’m alarmed that the knee-jerk reaction to someone’s idiotic babble these days is “Christ, what a moron; I’ve got to share this with everyone on Facebook.”

I mean, it works out great for me, since what I peddle is mostly opinionated nonsense. I appreciate the support (and I do mean that sincerely; it is genuinely nice when someone shares a link to MA101 on Facebook or Twitter or whatever). But it does seem kinda silly.

And what would be even sillier would be using your own blog to work out a line-by-line refutation of a piece that is, at the end of a day, just some chip-on-the-shoulder conservative trying to work out some of his insecurities publicly.

So we’re not doing that today.

And neither should you.

Now go post this on Facebook and tell your friends what a stupid jerk I am.

 

Marriage, Home Ownership, Parenthood, and Other Goals No One Is Actually Forcing You to Achieve

In a way I’m happy to see that generational angst isn’t limited to one generation.

Look wherever you want the last few weeks and you’ll find someone who’s unhappy with the way American life turned out for them: Anne-Marie Slaughter’s piece in The Atlantic examines why women still can’t “have it all,” Sierra over at the phoenix and the olive branch has an Open Letter from a Millennial about our acute awareness of our own shortcomings, and poor Jimmy Carter’s just sad that we don’t play nice with other nations (like we did back in his day?).

Okay, the last one’s less about expectations for American life than the others; I just enjoy Carter’s post-Presidential role as our political system’s loving but quietly-disappointed father.

But as far as the other pieces (and many, many more like them) go, the point is pretty basic: the rules have changed. The game kids got told they were going to play is not the game anymore. It’s getting harder and harder to achieve professional success and have that married, non-divorced, two-child household in a suburban home with a white picket fence.

And that’s sad and surely someone’s fault and yadda yadda yadda. If you want to read those sorts of articles I linked to two of them up top, and you won’t have to work hard to find more. I have a slightly different issue to raise, mostly with my generation but also to some extent with those above me (and very much with those below me, though I hope no one too young is reading this blog).

So serious-talk time, guys: Do you actually want to get married, buy a home, and have kids?

And if so, why?

I feel like those are goals that most people have not looked at objectively. The same way we’re finally starting to backpedal from assuming that everyone needs a four-year undergrad degree to “compete,” we need to be re-evaluating the “success” of getting married, buying a home, or having children.

Because you don’t actually have to do any of those things. They’re not inherent needs. They can be fun if that’s your thing, but is it actually your thing? Why?

I’m not saying some people don’t have a good answer for those questions; I’m saying many people seem to not be asking themselves those questions at all.

A whole lot of my friends and peers are desperately working their way through the dating scenes, both virtual and non, trying to find a perfect soulmate so they can get married before they turn 25 30 35 whatever depressing benchmark comes next. And they hate it. They hate the dating, they hate the websites, they hate the people; they hate the gnawing sensation that somehow they’re screwing up.

I have no idea why most of these people would want to get married.

For the people that do meet an awesome partner and decide that yes, this thing is going to be awesome now and forever, wanting to get married makes perfect sense. Marriage is a great goal for people who have found a fantastic life partner and want to arrange their life around that partnership.

But why, in the absence of that partner, would matrimony be something that weighs on your mind? It’s really not something you have to do.

Likewise home ownership. A mortgage is often cheaper to pay month-to-month than a rental lease, sure, but it ties you to that one spot and puts you on the hook for repairs and maintenance. Which is a trade I can totally see making — if you were in love with a particular house in a particular place and were willing to take those burdens to get that specific home that you wanted.

As just an abstract thing you feel like you should do, forget it. Houses are not the even vaguely-guaranteed increase in personal value they used to be. “Safe as houses” is a punchline these days. There’s no reason to take the added responsibility and the inconvenience of being tied to one place until you’re sure that it’s the perfect place and the house built on it is the perfect house.

And kids? Seriously now.

You don’t have to rush to have kids while you’re young and healthy. You don’t have to rush to have kids ever. There are already more of them than the planet can handle. Planting/popping out a couple of your own is about the most wasteful self-indulgence you’ll ever make in terms of environmental impact. Don’t do it unless it really is the major meaningful project you want to do with your life. If it’s not, do the thing you want to do, rather than doing both and moaning about how hard it is to balance your dreams with your family.

If the family wasn’t the dream in the first place, don’t fucking have one.

Now, all these things — getting married, owning a home; having kids — are things that some people might genuinely enjoy doing. They’re also things that some people might happen to be good at. In a few rare cases those two qualities might even overlap. And I support everyone’s right to decide whether they want to strive for those goals or not.

But if you’re still in the process of mapping out your life, you should take some time to think about whether or not those major “adulthood” milestones are on the route. Examine the if and the why. Question your assumptions.

And recognize that if you’re just doing something because it’s what grown-ups are expected to do, then you’re probably not doing a very good job of being a grown-up.

Seriously Though, Old People — Gay Sex Is So Vanilla, You Don’t Even Know (NSFW)

This week has been a little heavy on the social issues (well, apart from the Avengers nod on Tuesday, I suppose), so let’s just go ahead and cover one more before we try to take things easy:

People of our own sex is like the least fucked-up thing my generation has ever had a sexualized interest in. For serious.

I don’t know if people who still use TVs instead of the internet are actually aware of this. I have a sneaking suspicion that when you say “explicit sexuality” they’re still thinking “HBO’s A Game of Thrones.

This stuff.

There’s not really a gentle way to say this, so I’ll just lay it out there: oh good Christ no.

For a relatively tame example, let’s take the concept of futanari. In the simplest definition futanari means a female character with male genitalia, which is probably something of a jarring image if your idea of steamy is Khal Drogo up there spooning with a blonde.

This, only usually naked and doing sex. Seriously, it took me a long time to find a tame example.

Now adjust your world to understand that the futanari concept is super mainstream.

Not so much in live film, of course, for obvious technical reasons, although the U. S. has always had a reasonably thriving niche market of “she-male” porn. But the massive influence of 4chan.com and imitator “photoboard” sites has basically turned internet porn into a giant free-for-all of two-dimensional images, and that means that hentai (erotic anime) gets to share the main stage. And hentai is just full of futanari.

So you’re talking about a population that finds this stuff mainstream, often even tedious. It is not at all unusual to see people complaining about all the lame “futa” crap cluttering up more subject-specific image threads. I will leave it to either your imagination or your prior experience to decide what people with that kind of exposure might find freaky or fetishistic.

But it really does beg the question — who still expects anyone with a working internet connection to find same-sex relationships bizarre and troubling? It’s like worrying about the graphic violence in Star Wars.

There is really freaky shit out there if you want to look for it. People falling in love and wanting to get married — or even just wanting to bone in a commitment-free sort of way — does not qualify.

Pick a new thing to be afraid of.

Divorce Lawyer Ads Continue to Be Hilarious

I don’t actually find divorce itself hilarious, I swear I don’t, misanthropic namesake notwithstanding. But the guys who advertise divorce aid just continue to make my day.

Nothing will top the broken home giraffes, of course. (As far as I know that ad is still up at the zoo, too.) Still, this little sidebar ad caught my eye, mostly because it A) demonstrated a really alarming trend toward using text-message shorthand to save on paying for space, and B) didn’t seem to take into account that diamonds are generally harder than hammers.

But you can’t fault their taste for drama, and maybe it was cubic zirconium anyway. No wonder you’re leaving the bum.

Still. They at least seem to acknowledge that divorce is a dreadful, ripping process that destabilizes your life, and is something no one wants to consider until they have to. Especially not when they’re first celebrating their happy nuptials, perhaps ones that had been forbidden up ’til recently, and…say, what article did they run that ad by, anyway?

From the lovely gals at Wonkette. The article, that is; I doubt they had anything to do with the advertisement. It’s the juxtaposition to the big “Marriage Works” billboard that really sells it, don’t you think?

It’s Friday, so that’s all you get from me for a couple days. I’ll see you on Monday, and try not to get divorced in the meantime. Or gay married and then divorced, as the case may be. Happy marriage equality Maryland, though!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 788 other followers