Archive for the ‘ Media & Internet ’ Category

“Never Read the Comments” Finally Comes to MA101

Well, it was a good three-year run or so.

Apart from obvious and occasionally poetic spam, the comments here at MA101 have not needed much moderation. About a year ago I let them go completely open, rather than reading them and approving them one by one, and up until today I hadn’t had any problem commenters.

I’m still leaving things open, but I was sad to see someone really flying off the handle today, to the point that I had to go ahead and boot them. I guess all these years later “The Top 10 Most Absolutely Overrated Books You’ve Probably Had to Read” still arouses strong feelings.

Too strong, in some cases. I don’t have a comments policy here at MA101 because we’re all too intelligent for something like that, but to be clear: if you’re just posting insults directed at other commenters, I’m probably going to trash your comments. And if they’re really foully racist or sexist, I’m definitely going to trash your comments.

Now be good, all of you, and don’t make me turn admin approval back on. That shit gets tedious.

My Little Pony: Jailbait is Magic

Equestria_Girls_May_6_2013_movie_posterI’ve always thought it was a little sad that the brony phenomenon happened to a Hasbro property.

A smaller toy company might have had more reason to try and interact with a wholly-unexpected fanbase, and it could have gone interesting places.

Hasbro never really needed to do that.

The reality is that most My Little Pony toys aren’t going to fans of the show My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic, be they twenty-something males or tweeny girls. The toys are going to shoppers who put the pretty pink pony in the cart at Toys “R” Us because it’s pretty, and pink, and a pony, and it’s the pretty pink pony that Toys “R” Us has on the shelves.

And the volume of those shoppers is staggering. Even a really big internet fan base — like the one Friendship is Magic stumbled into — is a drop in the bucket compared to retail toy shoppers nationwide.

So you can color me unsurprised that the toy company is pivoting aggressively away from their adult fanbase with their new spinoff movie My Little Pony: Equestria Girls.

Equestria Girls takes the main cast of the TV show Friendship is Magic and sends them through the looking glass (literally) to a world where they’re all human(oid) teenage girls.

That has the interesting effect of taking characters that were pretty clearly self-sufficient adults, insofar as their pony world defined such things, and turning them into emphatically non-adult personalities.

And yes, it means that all the My Little Pony porn out there — and there’s quite a bit of it — just became child porn. I predict a massive scramble to remove any steamy fanfics featuring the “mane six” characters from brony websites, at least among the authors with good sense.

Because Twilight Sparkle might have been a grad student with a job at the library when you shipped her hot and steamy with Princess Celestia, but as of June 16th she’s jailbait.

Let the redactions begin!

But to all the bronies out there who view this as a “slap in the face,” and there are lots of you — you’re right. It is. Hasbro would like you to go away and stop making their ossified business model more complicated with your weird demographic anomaly so they can go back to pushing generic plastic ponies onto the shelves at Toys “R” Us.

Cheer up. You’ll always have the first Equestria Girls video, from before all this happened:

Good News/Bad News: Sleeping Around No Longer a Barrier to National Office, But Lying Isn’t Either

mark-sanfordOn the bright side, it’s nice to know that doing the horizontal tango with a full dance card isn’t the automatic disqualification from higher office that it used to be.

Mark Sanford is back, hiking the Appalachian Trail from his South Carolina district straight to Washington, D.C. as the newest member of the House of Representatives despite his extramarital affair with an Argentine mistress.

And now it looks like Anthony “Erectagram” Weiner might be taking a shot at mayoral office soon, though it remains to be seen how well he’ll do on that.

It’s starting to become a familiar story on Capitol Hill: boy meets girl, boy shows her his if she’ll show him hers; boy gets caught and retires from office to “spend more time with his family,” but returns a few election cycles later with a message of personal redemption.

All so well and good, insofar as the schtupping goes. I’m more than ready for Americans to agree that a hide-the-salami hobby doesn’t affect an elected official’s other qualifications (or lack thereof) for office.

But in return, could our elected officials maybe stop lying about their horizontal habits? I don’t object to a blunt “It’s not your business” (it’s not), but the openly false denials are a bit much in someone that’s writing the laws I have to abide by.

Tell you what — let’s stop treating it as a scandal when someone puts his-or-her swimsuit area up against someone else’s, and maybe our elected officials will stop feeling the need to assure us that they’re monogamous family types even when they’re not. Everybody wins!

Except, you know, all the people that don’t win their elections. That’s politics for you.

The Point at Which “Crowdfunding” Becomes “Panhandling”

evanston-panhandling-posterI had the odd experience recently of getting hit up for money by my friends.

Ha! Just kidding. That happens like every week, at the cash-only bar. People my age are terrible at carrying cash. (I’ve been bad lately myself, but that’s mostly because everything higher in denomination than my laundry quarters went to the IRS last month. Maybe they targeted me illegally for making political statements on my blog, HEYO!)

Anyway, the odd thing was not that people hit me up for money, but that it came by way of a Kickstarter knock-off crowd-funding site of some sort. I’d never run across this particular site before, but the idea was roughly the same as Kickstarter: the user posts a target fundraising goal and a description of their project, and people give small personal donations toward the overall goal. Or don’t give, as the case may be.

Only it wasn’t a project.

It was a road trip, for which these friends wanted some gas-and-food money. A pretty good chunk of it, as it turns out — multiple thousands, not to get too specific. Enough to house you for half a year if you’re not too picky about where you live and how often you get stabbed, let’s put it that way.

I’ve been having an odd time trying to decide how I feel about this tactic.

It’s not particularly offensive, in any tangible way. It’s a little pushy, in the way that asking for money always is, but it’s fairly low-key pushing. You can always ignore the link, or click on it, shrug, and walk away, and no one will ever be the wiser. An in-person “hey, can you spare $20 for gas when we go out west this summer?” is much more aggressive, and people have been doing that for generations.

anti-panhandling-adOn the other hand, it’s also less effort and personal investment for the askers. Coming to someone hat in hand requires you to swallow a lot of pride. It’s a measure of desperation — is whatever you need the money for really worth the humiliation of being a beggar? Posting one description on a website and blasting it out to all your Facebook and Twitter followers makes it fast and impersonal. Assuming anyone bites, you get a much higher cash-to-humiliation return.

And a part of me can’t help but see it as a bit of a perversion of the Kickstarter model. The idea was originally that you had a product, which investors eventually received, along with maybe some goodies for donating early. This particular request doesn’t offer anything but warm fuzzies (my words, not theirs).

I’m  not saying that something like “…and here’s the brand-new blog where we’ll be posting hilarious stories and pictures for all our donors” in the description would necessarily have cajoled money out of my wallet, but it would have at least shown some effort, and a sense of humor about the whole thing.

At the end of the day it’s just hard to get past the superfluousness of it. We’re not talking about bank-breaking sums for tuition or medical expenses or a business start-up here. We’re talking a couple grand for a road trip. Work some extra hours, save up, cut your expenses, and you’ll get there.

Begging for the money — however elegant or efficient the begging — seems like giving up too easy. It should be the last resort. If you don’t want a thing badly enough to try making some earning/spending adjustments before sticking your palm out, how much does it even mean to you?

I’m all for a freewheeling and bohemian lifestyle that rejects the conventional labor/capital model. But part of the charm of bohemians always was that they suffered for their art.

Also that they produced, you know, art. Or something of interest. Anything at all, really.

Ah well. Asking isn’t the same as getting, and we’ll see how the crowdfunding attempt goes.

If You Need a Video with Your David Foster Wallace, You’re Too Stupid for David Foster Wallace

This_Is_WaterInternet, I am so disappointed in you right now.

Did we really need to take a ten-minute speech, the audio and text of which were already freely available online, and make it into an inspirational video?

No, we did not.

But Matthew Freidell did it anyway, taking David Foster Wallace’s 2005 commencement address at Kenyon College and turning it into a monstrosity I will not even link to here.

(SPOILERS: It’s slow-mo shots of white people walking through a generic American cityscape, with words from the text periodically scribbled around them in floating, PowerPoint-style bubbles and lines. And yes, there are cute sound effects when words pop up on screen, to go with the poignant string muzak in the background.)

Go home, Matthew Friedell; you’re pretentious.

I am not actually the biggest David Foster Wallace fan in the world; I do not, for example, get along well with the MFA students who refer to him as “yeah, DFW, man” (yes, we have those around here — college town). Nor do I consider myself a particularly skilled interpreter of the man’s work, much less his inner thought processes, which were troubled to say the least.

But I think it’s pretty safe to say that someone who thought a David Foster Wallace speech would be improved by transubstantiation into a YouTube video with meaningless visual content and canned background music is someone that doesn’t realize he’s the butt of a lot of  Wallace’s jokes.

Internet, take your shitty film and go. Leave the live recordings and the text.

You’re not ready for David Foster Wallace yet.

Wait, There Are Still Insane Clown Posse Fans (Some of Whom are Minnesotan Terrorists)?

I wanted to lead this off by saying “So the FBI arrested some guy yesterday,” but I guess it takes a lot of departments to make an arrest these days?

Buford “Bucky” Rogers of Montevideo, MN was indeed arrested yesterday, following a search of his father’s trailer that allegedly turned up multiple pipe bombs and stockpiled weapons, but “the search warrant was conducted in conjunction with the ATF, Bloomington police bomb squad, Minnesota DNR, Minnesota State Patrol, Montevideo police and several local sheriffs,” according to Fox News.

And then the FBI released a statement saying this had thwarted a terror plot, so I guess they were involved too. Somehow.

Which, okay then, pretty weird, but sure. The guys with the handmade sign for a “Black Snake Militia” out front of their trailer home were probably due for a visit from Officer McFriendly, because “well-regulated” and all that. (They had another sign reading “No more I.F.R.D. We are not slaves,” a reference to radio frequency I.D. chips that the government isn’t actually implanting in anyone and that are spelled R.F.I.D. when you make an acronym out of them, but if you’re going to be afraid of non-existent chips I guess you can spell them however you want.)

Anyway.

This is all very weird and Minnesotan. Do you know what is even weirder, and also kinda more Minnesotan? Apparently Bucky Rogers is a big Insane Clown Posse fan.

buford-bucky-rogers-juggalo

Which has absolutely nothing to do with whether he’s a terrorist or not, or much of anything else, and even if he does turn out to be a terrorist and an Insane Clown Posse fan (a “juggalo,” in their argot) it doesn’t mean every Insane Clown Posse fan is a terrorist, but seriously, can we go back to the part where the Insane Clown Posse is still around?

I worked with a couple of ICP fans back when I was a summer camp counselor. That’s some 90s shit right there, my friend.

Or apparently not, since the FBI decided that juggalos were a gang as recently as 2011.

Seriously! The guys in clown masks who spray Faygo on people.

I guess there’s still quite a fan base out there, and a decidedly-not-fan base over at the Bureau. Who knew? Everyone needs a hobby — some guys dress up as clowns and go to concerts, some guys defend themselves against the New World Order, and a few guys do both. It’s a funny old world.

Mitt Romney’s Weird Flirtation with the Christian Patriarchy Fringe

mitt-romney-quiverfullMan, what is it with the former contenders for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination and the insane fringes of the Christian right?

Well, okay, maybe that’s not actually all that surprising of an overlap.

But these guys aren’t running for office anymore. It’s weird to find them way out on the loony fringe when there’s no votes on the line. Makes you wonder just how nuts they really were all along.

First we had Ron Paul tapping Gary North, a hardcore Christian Dominionist who’s advocated stoning children for disrespecting their parents, to head his new “Ron Paul Curriculum” homeschooling business.

Then this weekend Mitt Romney gave a commencement address at Southern Virginia University, during which he urged graduates to “Have a quiver full of kids, if you can.”

Quiverfull, really?

The remark doesn’t seem to have generated that much attention, and I think a lot of people just skimmed over it as another Mitt Romney awkwardism — a random stab at a hearty, folksy way of saying “lots.”

But it’s not, at least not in the context of having children. “Quiverfull,” from Psalm 127 (“As arrows are in the hand of a mighty man/so are children of the youth/Happy is the man that hath his quiver full of them”), is the chosen name of a movement in conservative Christianity that opposes all forms of family planning or birth control.

And I think it’s worth emphasizing that “any” there. What normal people would think of as birth control — condoms, the pill, etc. — is obviously out. So is the rhythm method. So is abstinence — married couples are expected to be “open to conception” by having regular sex. Not performing is a failing on the wife’s part.

It doesn’t take too much imagination to figure out how that sort of social movement could end up being bad for everyone in it, and there are plenty of horror stories out there if you want to read them. You’re talking about a group that believes women should marry young, have as many children as they’re physically capable of, and homeschool their children to do the same. Daughters obey their fathers until they’re married, and their husbands after that. The results are fairly predictable.

So, full circle — if Mittens wants to stand up and tell people that they’ll be happier if they get married and have kids young, that’s gross and sort of an abuse of his enormous privilege and power, but it’s not really a scandal.

When he decides to name-check a specific and abuse-ridden subset of conservative Christianity — and that’s pretty much the only meaning of the phase “quiver full” — that’s more deeply problematic.

Several “First Gay Things” Jason Collins is Not

jason-collins-cover-sports-illustratedI should start by saying that I actually liked Jason Collins’s coming-out essay in Sports Illustrated.

Apart from some odd metaphor choices (“Imagine you’re in the oven, baking”),  it’s clear, succinct, and honest without being lecturing. I think it’s written in a way that will, hopefully, speak to athletes and sports fans who haven’t really come to terms with the idea of homosexual players.

(We call those people “in denial” around here, or just plain old “bad people,” but that’s part of why Mr. Collins’s essay will probably go over better with them than anything we might write.)

That said, Jason Collins is not the first gay athlete. There have always been gay athletes, just like there have always been gay everything else, so that would be a pretty silly claim.

But let’s assume that when people say “first gay such-and-such,” they’re implying openly gay, in the current social interpretation of the word, and are limiting it to modern record.

Jason Collins — still not the first.

That award probably goes to Martina Navratilova, who came out willingly in 1981, or to Billie Jean King, who was unwillingly outed in the same year.

First pro basketball player? That one goes to Sue Wicks, a former WNBA player who came out in 2002.

First active pro basketball player? Sheryl Swoops, 2005.

In fact, once you get done crunching through all the recent comings-out, Mr. Collins is only one really unique thing: he is the first male player of a major league American sport to come out during his active career.

Keep that in mind as you read the wall-to-wall coverage that seems to have swallowed the sports blogs this week. It’s probably a good thing, insofar as the majority of that coverage seems affirming — but it’s worth asking why it took until Mr. Collins for an athlete coming out to be a big deal.

Well, okay, it’s not worth asking if you already know the answer. So never mind.

“Game of Thrones” Piracy — Yeah, I Called That One

pirate-flagThree days after the premiere of HBO’s Game of Thrones, I wrote on this blog about the challenge of obtaining it legally, and the inevitability of widespread Game of Thrones piracy.

A while later, the popular website The Oatmeal made a comic along almost exactly the same lines. I took this less as a sign of plagiarism on The Oatmeal‘s part (and even if it had been, it’d be pretty hypocritical to complain about it, under the circumstances), and more as a sign that everyone on the internet was having the same experience I was with the show. But the comic certainly made the “why people are pirating Game of Thrones” discussion a popular one.

Two years later, the basic problems that both The Oatmeal and I pointed out remain: HBO has no effective online distribution for non-cable-subscribers, the show’s demographics overlap solidly with the main participants in online piracy (young, predominantly white males), and it’s impossible to purchase the show independent of HBO’s other content (possibly the most crippling flaw in an iTunes-trained market, where media is expected to come a la carte).

And whaddayaknow, Game of Thrones shattered all piracy records on the books in 2012. Even those numbers are probably a lowball, given how hard it is to accurately track most of the piracy that’s occurring.

Australia, a big leader in Game of Thrones piracy (in large part because the release is delayed there, on top of all the above-mentioned problems), even earned a Facebook scold from the U.S. ambassador earlier this week. Nearly all the replies were along the same basic lines of “yeah, we’d buy it if we could get it on time and without subscribing to a bunch of other crap” (but in sexier accents, one assumes).

HBO’s solutions for 2013 apparently include bumping international air dates as far forward as possible (still a week after the US air date, in most cases) and making HBO-Go, their streaming service for cable package subscribers, available internationally.

Any bets on how much of a difference that’ll make?

In a way, it doesn’t really matter that much. HBO, as long as it keeps its current business model, probably isn’t losing too many potential subscribers to piracy — the people stealing Game of Thrones are the people that aren’t going to buy HBO’s entire package just to get the show, no matter how much they like it. That’s not lost revenue; HBO was never going to have those customers in the first place.

The director of the show effectively said as much at the Perth Writer’s Festival, acknowledging that “cultural buzz” mattered more for a show’s survival than the ratings numbers from legal viewers, though he was quickly forced into a walkback and a condemnation of piracy.

And given that they’ve already re-upped it for a fourth season, it seems clear that HBO is making enough money off Game of Thrones to be happy with it, piracy notwithstanding. It may even be making enough that it’s honestly not worth their while to try and come up with a new distribution method that would appeal to many of the current pirates.

I’m all right with that. If everyone’s happy, keep the show rolling and the piracy numbers record-breaking.

But those numbers aren’t going to go down as long as the only legal way to watch A Game of Thrones as it airs is with a full cable subscription, plus the extra HBO fee.

A company can make something available instantly and online or not, as it pleases, but it’s going to be available instantly and online either way.

The Internet Has Ruined “I Don’t Own a TV”

rupauls-drag-raceRemember the good old days when you could bow out of any entertainment-related conversation just by saying “I don’t own a TV”?

Yeah, the internet ruined that one.

I’m put in mind of this by an Onion article  – “Area Man Constantly Mentioning He Doesn’t Own a Television” — that one of my Tuesday night X-Rated Trivia teammates shared, in large part because we’re constantly getting hammered on the RuPaul’s Drag Race questions.

If you miss one of those in a gay bar, obviously, the immediate and universal reaction is “Ohmigawd don’t you watch RuPaul?”

And you know what? We tried the “we don’t own a TV” thing. We really did. It’s been my default out on pop culture questions practically since birth, and suddenly it failed me: “Uh, you guys know it’s online, right?”

Well fuck.

Look, we tried to be polite. We go out of our way not to be the “I’d just rather be reading Proust” asshole from the Onion article. But if you’re going to force the point, yeah, we don’t know the RuPaul questions because the show is shit, TV in general is shit, and we really would rather be reading Proust, or for that matter reading The Onion.

Sorry. We tried to give you the “pity the poor culturally benighted Luddites” angle, but no. You had to push, and now you’re stuck with the “quietly resent those effete intellectuals” role.

Well, okay, probably not “effete.” It is a gay bar. They don’t really hold that against you.

But seriously. The internet ruined my best out. Now I have to actually tell you that I think your show is stupid and I won’t bother watching it even when it’s easily accessible.

No hard feelings?

“Hard,” hur hur hur.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 774 other followers