Misanthropology 101

August 23, 2010

The Top 10 Most Absolutely Overrated Books You’ve Probably Had to Read

It takes a very complicated algorithm to determine what balance of critical history, publication volume, and content makes a book “overrated,” and I’m sure you’re all dying to see that math — no?  I should just go ahead with the list, and you can cheer me on as I pander to your sympathies or curse my name as I skewer your old favorites?  God, I love list entries.  So with the cold calculation of science, I present to you what are undoubtedly the most severely overrated written works you’ve probably had to read — or at least pretend you read:

10.  THUS SPOKE ZARATHUSTRA by Friedrich Nietzsche

Alternatively “Thus Spake Zarathustra,” or for all I know “Zarathustra Once Said” in some translations.  Friedrich Nietzche wrote a number of responses to what he saw as centuries of dense, incomprehensible moralizing texts, but Thus Spoke Zarathustra is by far the densest, most incomprehensible, and most moralizing of his offerings.  Discontented undergrads have quoted it for years, usually without reading the whole thing, and who can blame them?

Apart from some entertaining cracks about everyone being monkeys and God being dead, there isn’t actually anything there except for hundreds and hundreds of pages of puns on words like “under” and “over” that don’t translate out of the original German.  The selections in Bartlett’s Familiar Quotations are more than ample for anyone who wants to sound like a pretentious asshole, which satisfies 99% of the population that might consider reading this book and therefore earns it a place on the list of The Top 10 Most Absolutely Overrated Books You’ve Probably Had to Read list.

9.  IVANHOE by Sir Walter Scott

Imagine everything about stories set in some unspecified “medieval” land of knights, castles, and chivalry that we as hip, sophisticated, cynical, post-modern readers like to turn our noses up at.  Ivanhoe didn’t really start all that, but it certainly perfected it, and the blow is the more crushing because Walter Scott is generally considered the inventor of the modern historical novel.

It’s hard to summarize Ivanhoe because it reads sort of like a full season of a particularly schizophrenic HBO series:  we have jousts, fights, abductions, love affairs (boringly chaste, don’t worry), religious and racial tensions (insofar as Saxon and Norman are different races), and some gratuitous Robin Hood bits all jammed together by Walter Scott’s unflaggingly turgid prose.  This used to be a required staple of the public school canon, and is thankfully on its way out (unfairly, most objections are based on the portrayal of the Jewish love interest rather than the fact that it’s an awful goddamn book.)  Still, its influence on the cultural consciousness and continuing presence on some required reading lists clinches it as one of The Top 10 Most Absolutely Overrated Books You’ve Probably Had to Read list.

8.  ATLAS SHRUGGED by Ayn Rand

The title of Rand’s seminal work evokes the mythical Titan who held the weight of the world on his shoulders, but we’re thinking maybe he was just carrying a couple copies of Atlas Shrugged instead.  It weighs in somewhere over a thousand pages depending on your edition, over a hundred of which will be a single speech by a single character — practically a novel in its own right, except for the absence of plot, character, dialogue, or anything else enjoyable to read.

In this day and age Atlas Shrugged would vanish among the heaps of other “distopian” novels that exaggerate a single aspect of modern government to make a very heavy-handed point (I once saw these categorized as “bitchtopian novels,” much to my delight), but in 1957 it was pretty radical stuff and so we’re still stuck with the damn thing half a century later.  Whether you share Rand’s belief in the free market or recoil in horror from her work (a reasonable reaction to what she clearly thought were sexy love scenes but are pretty much just graphically-described rape), you can’t get away from the fact that there’s not much plot and no detailed characters, making this unquestionably one of The Top 10 Most Absolutely Overrated Books You’ve Probably Had to Read.

7.  HOW TO WIN FRIENDS AND INFLUENCE PEOPLE by Dale Carnegie

This is apparently still a popular gift to freshly-minted MBAs (presumably from other, older-minted and therefore slightly tarnished MBAs).  I don’t know if anyone else still has to read it, unless they spend their time making lists of overrated books, so perhaps its time on this list is limited?  We should be so lucky — Dale Carnegie’s classic work is equal parts a guide to being a complete square and to being a goddamn liar (which is an impressive feat of personality juggling when you think about it).

If you’ve ever dealt with one of those middle managers who never say anything nice but won’t stop smiling?  Yeah, they read this book.  It will teach you how to sound sincere and earnest about everything, including where you’d like to go for lunch, which will help you become a person who sounds sincere and earnest about where he/she wants to go to lunch.  Do you want to be that person?  Do you even want to know that person?  Apparently a vast percentage of the population does, if overall sales are anything to go by, making this very definitely one of The Top 10 Most Absolutely Overrated Books You’ve Probably Had to Read.

6. THE LAST OF THE MOHICANS by James Fenimore Cooper

To put things in perspective for modern readers, James Fenimore Cooper was basically the Steven King, Robert Jordan, etc. of antebellum America in terms of sales and impact on the popular culture, and he was about as concerned with consistency or quality in his work. I feel a little redundant panning any of Cooper’s “Leatherstocking” tales since Mark Twain did it earlier and better in an essay called Fenimore Cooper’s Literary Offenses, but his opinion remains the minority in the public schools at least — they keep assigning the damn books, with Last of the Mohicans leading the pack (presumably because they made a movie of it, thereby providing the teacher with a solid four days of uninterrupted smoking out back while the class watches the video).

Suffice it to say that Natty Bumpo remains one of the more overpowered and under-characterized protagonists in the traditionally overpowered and under-characterized annals of genre fiction (and this at a time when “genre fiction” was at least a century away from being a well-defined category).  There were a lot less books in 1826, so desperation gives the original audience some grounds for forgiveness, but the book’s enduring popularity confirms its place as one of The Top 10 Most Overrated Books You’ve Probably Had to Read.

5. GRIMM’S FAIRY TALES by Jacob and Wilheim Grimm

We’ve thoroughly backlashed against the Eisenhower era by now, so everyone knows that early fairy tales were a kind of Victorian Quentin Tarantino thriller, right?  Well, no.  Setting aside the fact that the Bros. Grimm were Victorian by neither nationality nor publishing date, most of the stories also weren’t all that horrific by anyone’s standards, modern or otherwise.  Outrage with the “Children’s Stories” mostly centered around the allusions (veiled) to sexual activity and the presence of dense scholarship alongside the stories, not the violence.

Modern readers looking for the “real” version of Disney favorites will be disappointed to find out that a) Most Disney movies aren’t based on Grimm stories and b) The “sanitized” modern versions often aren’t all that different from the originals.  They’re still stories for children, and therefore pretty simplified moral lessons with the same familiar cast of character archetypes.  In honor of disappointed eyeshadow-wearing middle schoolers, I’m proud to christen this as unquestionably one of The Top 10 Most Absolutely Overrated Books You’ve Probably Had to Read.

4.  THE LORD OF THE RINGS by J. R. R. Tolkien

Sure, we could get worked up about details like implied racism or the absence of female characters, but why bother when Tolkien’s beloved trilogy suffers from the much greater flaw of being really fucking boring?  The influence of Icelandic epics and Norse sagas on The Lord of the Rings is clear and well-documented, and sure — back when Beowulf was hot shit, it was important to know what Hrothgwang gave to Hrothswanger, because you lived two hills over from Hrothwanger and probably wanted to know that someone had given him a giant fucking sword to hit you with.  But there is no justification for that shit in 1954.

Remember that the “trilogy” was written as a single work weighing in at multiple thousands of pages, and that’s after Tolkien realized that he was going to have to make substantial cuts before anyone would touch the thing.  Many of those pages are filled with interesting characters, epic battles, and questions of good and evil — but many, many more are filled with the genealogies of made-up kingdoms and descriptions of the different cloaks worn by different Elf-Kings, earning The Lord of the Rings its place on the list of The Top 10 Most Absolutely Overrated Books You’ve Probably Had to Read.

3. FINNEGANS WAKE by James Joyce

For those of you who don’t take the time to click through to the Wikipedia entries on these titles, here’s a snippet from their summary:

“…The entire book is written in a largely idiosyncratic language, consisting of a mixture of standard English lexical items and neologistic multilingualpuns and portmanteau words, which many critics believe attempts to recreate the experience of sleep and dreams.”

That’s a polite way of saying that this landmark work is completely fucking unreadable.  And yet it remains the critical standard by which all other works, including some very fine ones by Joyce himself, are judged and found wanting (at least by pretentious wankers the literary/academic elite).  I can’t offer you a summary because there isn’t one — outside of a few generally agreed-upon plot points, even dedicated Joyce scholars haven’t been able to translate the text of the book into a meaningful narrative.

There aren’t even Cliff’s Notes, because the people who write Cliff’s Notes aren’t equipped for the kind of analysis it takes to get of meaning out of Finnegans Wake.  Nonetheless, some of the greatest writers of the 20th century have declared this a work of genius, and it remains required reading for the true lit-crit snobs, thus allowing it to place in the final heat of The Top 10 Most Absolutely Overrated Books You’ve Probably Had to Read.

2.  TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD by Harper Lee

Before the outrage begins, let me remind you that this is a list of overrated books, not bad ones.  I quite like To Kill a Mockingbird myself, but it will always remain a children’s story no matter how many talk-show hosts hail it as one of the great American novels of all times.  Like many first-person narratives it falls into the trap of establishing a character for the narrator that the prose cannot possibly reflect — in this case a rurally-educated six year-old girl, whose narrative voice frequently varies in the space of a paragraph from broken and folksy to sweepingly poignant and well beyond a first grader’s vocabulary or emotional understanding.

Perhaps the book’s popularity stems from its ability to touch on difficult social issues like racism without becoming difficult or confusing, which to me suggests that it’s not doing a very thorough job of portraying those issues — and for kids, that’s fine.  But as long as people insist on treating this like a work of serious literary weight, it remains high on the list of The Top 10 Most Absolutely Overrated Books You’ve Probably Had to Read.

1.  THE BIBLE by *

I know what you’re thinking — yes, it’s an oversized series of works purportedly by a single author (but actually written in his name by a host of credited and uncredited ghostwriters), chronicling the career of a single destined savior with miraculous powers and just about every relative or associated character they could come up with a prequel/sequel/spin-off for, but is Star Wars The Wheel of Time the Bible really a bad work?  Maybe not.  But taken as a whole it certainly tries to be too many things at once, until the reader is left wondering just what they’re holding — is it a historical record?  An instructive moral text?  An epic adventure?  Any one of those answers gets bogged down with the others, making it hard to like the completed product.

There are parts that make very fine reading, and parts that are incomprehensible, which is not altogether unusual or noteworthy.  Were it anything but the most published work in all of written history, the Bible probably would have been spared a place on the list altogether — but that kind of hype is very hard to live up to, and so it rests atop The Top 10 Most Absolutely Overrated Books You’ve Probably Had to Read, which you’ve just finished.

29 Comments »

  1. Finally something I can have an opinion on. Although I have been mercifully spared from the majority of this list – I can’t agree more with Ayn Rand’s inclusion. My favorite part is the thirty pages radio broadcast which reiterates her whole philosophy for those not paying attention to the first 420 pages of it smacking you in the face. I did enjoy Ivanhoe, though.

    Comment by Jenny — August 23, 2010 @ 11:47 am

    • I admit the title is a bit disingenuous — most people probably haven’t actually had to read all ten of these. But they’ve probably heard of most of them, perhaps in that tone of voice that implies that educated human beings OUGHT TO HAVE read [overrated book here], and that was good enough for me.

      In the interests of full disclosure, even I have not read Finnegans Wake cover to cover, and I may have skimmed here or there in the Old Testament as well.

      Comment by cubbageg — August 23, 2010 @ 1:05 pm

    • You’re a fucking statist idiot if you didn’t like Atlas Shrugged.

      Comment by God — December 22, 2011 @ 7:23 pm

      • and your a soullness philistine if you did

        Comment by andrewgroos — January 22, 2012 @ 11:03 pm

  2. Oddly enough, I read at least 3 of these for the first time between fourth and 8th grade, and all more or less of my own accord — Ivanhoe, which I actually kind of liked, but maybe it’s a book best enjoyed by a younger and hopefully less cynical reader; The Lord of the Rings, which confounded me (with the boredom you mention) at age 10, only to return and finish it (and mostly enjoy it) a few years later; and Last of the Mohicans, which numbers among the very few books which I began but never finished (I definitely didn’t enjoy it).

    I may have also first read To Kill a Mockingbird in that time, but I don’t actually remember (or care that much).

    But mostly (as far as I am able to judge for books I haven’t read) this seems a pretty reasonable list to me.

    P.S. Maybe you could do a follow up on Newberry books that even the dullest child couldn’t love. They’re all mostly viewed through the lens of elementary school (and that aweful 6th grade L.A. teacher we both had, who’s name I forget) so I’m not 100% behind this statement, but I remember a few of them being pretty aweful.

    P.P.S. What’s the difference between “who’s” and “whose” and did I do it right in the first post script? I found myself hung up on it momentarily and decided I’d ask you rather than agonize over it.

    Comment by Christopher — August 23, 2010 @ 6:02 pm

    • Odwarka [sp.], and “who’s” is the contraction form of “who is.” So you wanted to use the other one.

      Comment by cubbageg — August 23, 2010 @ 6:24 pm

  3. Hey, no dissing LOTR around here there might be rabid fans about. You know, the ones who have never read the books but swear by the movie that they are the best thing ever. Yeah, gotta watch out for those.

    Comment by tsuchigari — August 25, 2010 @ 3:59 pm

    • I was more worried about rabid Bible fans, frankly. but so far so good!

      Comment by cubbageg — August 25, 2010 @ 6:19 pm

  4. You should be worried about rabid fans of To Kill A Mocking Bird, it’s the best book on that list.

    Comment by t.o. Aster — August 26, 2010 @ 8:16 am

    • Well, like the entry says, “overrated” doesn’t necessarily mean “bad.”

      Comment by cubbageg — August 26, 2010 @ 9:59 am

  5. [...] readers will already have noticed the similarity to posts like my own The Top 10 Most Absolutely Overrated Books You’ve Probably Had to Read and the ever-popular Hunks of the Western Literature Canon.  These were not made in conscious [...]

    Pingback by Random Writing: Lists Are Funny, No Shitting « Misanthropology 101 — September 1, 2010 @ 1:21 am

  6. [...] valiantly for some kind of shared ground.  Tolkien was mentioned, some of the complaints from my Most Absolutely Overrated Books You’ve Probably Had to Read list came up, and the whole thing sort of dissolved into a soup of mutual disgust that wound up [...]

    Pingback by Writers: Not Necessarily Experts on Books « Misanthropology 101 — September 13, 2010 @ 12:01 am

  7. [...] rand overrated,” “tolkien overrated,” etc. — This remains one of my most popular posts, though still second to The Hunks of the Western Literature [...]

    Pingback by OMG Sick, also Search Terms « Misanthropology 101 — October 1, 2010 @ 6:18 am

  8. [...] The Blockbuster Years:  People in late 18th-century America couldn’t get enough of these.  The stories taught such a great moral lesson that even women were allowed to write them, accounting for a massive publishing spree leading up to the turn of the century.  The passion then dropped off in favor of very slightly less offensive interpretations of the wise savage and the generous white man, which we’ve already lambasted on this blog. [...]

    Pingback by Five Blockbuster Genres (That Absolutely No One Writes Anymore) « Misanthropology 101 — November 3, 2010 @ 1:30 am

  9. [...] reaches down, finds a pair, and has the Book Seven showdown months before everything goes all Kristallnacht.  Sure, the bad guys use Killing Curses or whatever, but it’s not like “good [...]

    Pingback by Five Endings to “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows” That Would Have Been So Much Better « Misanthropology 101 — November 12, 2010 @ 3:47 am

  10. [...] positive things about the human race and creative endeavor in particular (I make an exception for books everyone secretly hates anyway).  If you can’t say anything nice, either say nothing or sprinkle it with profanity and post [...]

    Pingback by Misanthropology 101 — December 6, 2010 @ 1:56 am

  11. [...] positive things about the human race and creative endeavor in particular (I make an exception for books everyone secretly hates anyway).  If you can’t say anything nice, either say nothing or sprinkle it with profanity and post [...]

    Pingback by Happy Birthday to the Blog « Misanthropology 101 — December 6, 2010 @ 1:57 am

  12. [...] — I’m sure people who Google “Ayn Rand overrated” and find “The Top 10 Most Absolutely Overrated Books You’ve Probably Had to Read” aren’t disappointed.  But for the most part it’s people looking for a good deal [...]

    Pingback by Writing Blogs, Search Terms, and Our Corporate Overlords « Misanthropology 101 — January 31, 2011 @ 12:50 am

  13. [...] mentioned before that literary critics still have no real consensus as regards what the hell Finnegans Wake is about [...]

    Pingback by Misanthropology 101 — February 11, 2011 @ 3:46 pm

  14. [...] mentioned before that literary critics still have no real consensus as regards what the hell Finnegans Wake is about [...]

    Pingback by An Object Lesson in Greeting Cards « Misanthropology 101 — February 11, 2011 @ 3:47 pm

  15. The only one I’ve read in this list is Mockingbird, and I didn’t think it was a bad story at all, but it wasn’t the stunning work of literary brilliance I was expecting based on the opinions of…well, pretty much everyone I encountered who talked about it. I tried reading Tolkioen’s LotR, for about ten minutes, but it was so boring I couldn’t continue. I have Atlas Shrugged in my personal ebook library, along with other works of Ayn Rand, and at one point I wanted to read it, but I keep hearing rumblings in book-reading circles about the 90-page speech by a single character, and the 30-page broadcast, which I wouldn’t ordinarily mind, except that in every disgussion about these parts of the book, people keep mentioning that all they do is repeat the philosophy that can be found in the other thousand pages of the book, and add nothing new. I have repeatedly tried reading parts of Finegan’s Wake, and cannot find anything understandable in the thing.

    Comment by Ali Al-Hajamy — March 27, 2011 @ 2:23 pm

  16. One more thing: Why isn’t Great Gatsby on here? Surely the simple mention of the book will leave former high school students groaning with the memory of interminable English classes where they were forced to go over every single metaphor and symbol in the whole damned book. I liked the story when I read it the first time, even though it isn’t much more than a glorified soap opera, but became sick of it when my English class read it soon after. Which, come to think of it, is exactly what happened with Mockingbird. The first time I read it, I liked it. The second time for English class, I became bored with it. The third time, which I didn’t have to do, but felt I should so as to make the essay I was writing as good as it could be, I hated it for a few months.

    Comment by Ali Al-Hajamy — March 27, 2011 @ 2:30 pm

  17. [...] Anyway.  Uncharitable thoughts.  Mine were not about Ayn Rand’s philosophy or the various embarrassing attempts of people to treat it like a serious model for society, nor for Atlas Shrugged‘s merits as a book, which I’ve already discussed here. [...]

    Pingback by Uncharitable Thoughts « Misanthropology 101 — April 1, 2011 @ 8:57 am

  18. [...] “Overrated books” and several variations on it, most that add a specific title or author (e.g., “ayn rand overrated”) – I assume that people searching for these found exactly what they were looking for in the perennial favorite The Top 10 Most Absolutely Overrated Books You’ve Probably Had to Read. [...]

    Pingback by Sick Day: Search Term Roundup « Misanthropology 101 — September 15, 2011 @ 12:05 am

  19. Where’s “the great gatsby” on this?

    Comment by Olly — October 8, 2011 @ 12:18 pm

  20. [...] And The Big #1:  The Top 10 Most Absolutely Overrated Books You’ve Probably Had to Read [...]

    Pingback by MA101 in 2011: the Greatest Hits « Misanthropology 101 — December 30, 2011 @ 9:07 am

  21. Where’s Harry Potter?

    Comment by Mike — January 6, 2012 @ 9:40 pm

  22. You forgot “Catcher in the Rye”! J.

    Comment by J. Boudreaux — January 25, 2012 @ 1:33 pm

  23. [...] This is one of those “makes sense when you think about it” lessons that you’ll eventually hit in any business.  I mean, you like doing people favors, right?  Feels nice.  The warm fuzzy of selfless generosity, or alternatively the adrenaline rush of power over someone else — depends on how cynically you want to interpret generosity.  (I assume most of you fall on the in-favor side, since I’ve already offended any Ayn Rand fans away long ago.) [...]

    Pingback by The Importance of Asking for Favors « Misanthropology 101 — January 30, 2012 @ 1:41 pm


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Theme: Silver is the New Black. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 29 other followers